Skip to content

You have the data. Now get the answer out of it.

Custom models, built on your own data. The answers a chatbot can’t reach, because they have to be modelled, not read.

Sounds like you if you have data, and a decision you keep making by gut.

  • A PhD specialist on your problem
  • A straight call on whether ML is the right tool
  • Runs where your data is, and it stays yours
The difference of ML

You tried AI on this, and it couldn't answer.

You’ve got the images, the sensor feeds, the years of records - and a decision you still make by hand. If a chatbot couldn’t help, it’s because it was built for a different job: a chatbot reads documents; a model learns from your measurements. The answer is already in your data. It just has to be modelled out.

Your data today

With a model on it

You tried a chatbot on it, and it couldn't answer the question.

A model built for the question, trained on your own data.

A chatbot answers what's written down; this learns what your measurements mean.

A person eyeballs every image, part or reading to make the call.

The model makes the routine call, and flags the ones a human should see.

Years of data sit in storage, doing nothing.

That history becomes a forecast, a risk score, or an early warning.

You'd need thousands of labelled failure examples to start.

Anomaly methods learn from normal operation alone - no failure library needed.

The model sounds just as sure when it's wrong.

Every output carries a measure of confidence, so you know when to trust it.

The data was always enough. It needed the right model on it.

What it does

Models for the answers that live in your data.

Custom models on your own images, video, sensors, signals and records - built from first problem framing through to production, with an early, honest call on whether machine learning is even the right tool.

Computer vision

Teach a model to see what your people check by eye, in images and video.

  • Detect, classify and segment - defects, cracks, wear, objects and assets
  • Pixel-level inspection that shows where the fault is, not just that there is one
  • Works where the thing you're looking for is rare and examples are few

Sensors, signals and time series

Turn a measurement stream into something you can act on.

  • Acoustic, vibration, environmental, flow, load and telemetry data
  • Denoising, calibration, event detection and forecasting
  • Built for how real sensors behave: drift, dropout, devices that disagree

Anomaly detection

Find what's abnormal without ever defining abnormal first.

  • Trains on normal operation alone - no labelled history of failures needed
  • Condition monitoring, quality assurance, unusual transactions and fraud
  • Learn what normal looks like, then flag everything that isn't

Forecasting and uncertainty

Model what happens next, with an honest measure of how sure it is.

  • Demand, capacity, risk and pricing, with a confidence range on every result
  • Bayesian and statistical rigour - is the result real, or is it noise?
  • Uncertainty quantification is our specialism, and the subject of a pending US patent
Why it works

A specialist on your problem, who owns it end to end.

Dr Vincent Russell holds a PhD in applied mathematics (University of Auckland, Dean's List) and has spent 7+ years building ML and statistical models. He's co-inventor on a pending US patent for AI-based uncertainty quantification, and was lead ML engineer on an air-quality programme running in production.

98/100
defective parts separated from good, on a public benchmark
0
defect examples needed - anomaly models train on normal data
US patent
pending, on the uncertainty methods behind the work

The public-benchmark result above (roughly 10,800 photos across 12 products, one model, trained only on good parts) shows the approach; everything a procurement or legal team needs is in our Trust Centre

  • PhD-led, so you get an answer even from data that defeats off-the-shelf tools.
  • Runs where your data is - edge, on-premise or cloud - and your data stays yours, never used to train a model.
  • Every model flags its own uncertainty, so your team knows when to trust it.
  • A straight answer on whether ML is even the right tool - sometimes a simpler fix wins, and we say so early, before the spend.
We crunch through complex data to generate insights, and RIVER made it simple to work through, while keeping everyone aligned on our core value proposition.
Alex OsbornCTO, trev · 2024
Getting started

Prove it's feasible first, then build.

Feasibility

Weeks, fixed scope

Is there signal in the data, what accuracy is realistic, and is ML even the right tool? You get a written assessment and a baseline. A no arrives in weeks, not month nine.

Prototype

Next

A model trained on your own data, measured against the target we agreed at feasibility, with results you can inspect case by case.

Production

Then, and ongoing

Deployed into the environment it has to live in - edge, on-premise or cloud - with monitoring, versioning and retraining built in, so it stays honest as conditions change.

The investment

Project size

A short, fixed-scope study: is there signal, and is ML the right tool?

From $7,500+ GST setup, then support

Or start on the Retainer from $5,000 a month. If something isn’t delivered, that month is free.

Every engagement includes

  • A straight call on whether ML is the right tool for the problem
  • A model trained on your own data, with results you can inspect
  • A confidence measure on the model's outputs, so you know when to trust it
  • Deployment where your data lives - edge, on-premise or cloud
  • Monitoring, versioning and retraining, so it stays honest over time
  • Your data and your model, yours to keep and never used to train anyone else's
Questions

The questions people ask when they’re ready to move.

Ready when you are

Easy to start. Fast to prove. Built to scale.

Tell us about your machine learning, and we’ll take it from there. Prefer to look first? Ask Moana, or take the free Readiness Check.

Client stories

Teams like yours, in their own words.

A decade of work, across health, sport, finance and the public good.